A woman twice showed up uninvited at Kamala Harris and Doug Emhoff's $8 million Malibu home, prompting security to call the sheriff late Friday evening.
With the political world obsessed with the rather flimsy indictment in New York of former President Donald Trump, here’s what puzzles me: Why did Trump pay off somebody to keep quiet something that was already prominently in the public domain?
INDICTMENT SECRECY REPEATS PATTERN OF PAST EFFORTS TARGETING TRUMP. Everyone in the universe knew that an indictment of former President Donald Trump would be an explosive event in the political, legal, and media worlds. It would be something everybody talked about, dominating television, the internet, social media, radio, everything. And indeed, that has turned out to be the case.
Walking the runway at the 20th annual Dressed to Kilt charity fashion show on Saturday was none other than Sean Spicer, the first White House press secretary of Donald Trump's presidency. The Washington Examiner caught up with Spicer after his walk down the runway, and the Newsmax host blasted Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's impending indictment of his former boss.
Just in time for April Fools' Day, California passed a law that purports to stop "price gouging" by gas stations. Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom's communications staff, which cannot spell the word "vise," boasted that the new law "creates a dedicated, day-in and day-out, independent watchdog to root out price gouging by oil companies and authorizes the California Energy Commission to create a penalty to hold the industry accountable."
During the coronavirus pandemic, California Gov. Gavin Newsom imposed draconian anti-COVID measures, which of course he never had any intention of observing himself. Newsom (along with Nancy Pelosi and other ruling-class Democrats) broke his own rules with impunity.
If you're involved at all in pro-life activism, then you have heard of the FACE Act. This is a federal law, signed by President Bill Clinton in 1994, that is typically used to sue pro-life protesters for blocking access to abortion clinics. The idea is to add a steep financial penalty to any possible criminal penalties, as the former can actually be considerably more intimidating than the latter.
